Sunday, August 24, 2008

The end of an era: Tinsley Towers fall

Sunday August 24: 3am GMT: the two former cooling towers at Tinsley, an iconic image of Sheffield's industrial past have fallen.

Often referred to as the 'Tinsley towers', the 250ft high structures stand approx 17 metres away from the M1 viaduct, and were previously dubbed the 'gateway to the North' by some and were generally thought of as landmarks by the locals.



The Towers: before (left) and on the way down (right)
But it was E.ON UK who owned the two cooling towers at the Blackburn Meadows site in Sheffield, and who sought the demolition to make way for the site to be regenerated.

E.ON* plans to build a £60m new biomass power station that will generate enough electricity for around 40,000 homes and its planning application was approved by Sheffield City Council earlier this year.

The locals protested the proposed action so much that a trust was set up to preserve the towers. On the website of the
Tinsley Towers Trust*, it reads: "English Heritage wrote that the Towers, built in 1938, are the oldest surviving hyperbolic Cooling Towers in the UK and that their prominence provides a visual indication of the former scale and importance of Sheffield’s steel industry."

The Trust's website also quotes a BBC online poll established whose results said that three quarters of the public want to see the two towers saved. According to the poll, this figure equated to more than half a million supporters in Sheffield and Rotherham alone.

When I first arrived in Sheffield I thought of the two towers as eyesores over the landscape near to Meadowhall, the large shopping centre that I made a point in not visiting. But over time, and many trips to Sheffield and back in the car, the two towers start to grow on you and when you see them from the M1, you know that you're back in Sheffield.

The worry for the Trust and local residents is that the loss of the Towers will result in a loss of identity for the city and that the new proposed biomass plant will not create enough jobs for the area. Sheffield will rise again but its two towers have fallen, and now motorists will have to pay extra attention when they approach the city to make sure they take the correct exit!

BBC Article (plus demolition video): click here *
Further photos from the demolition:
click here *

Monday, August 18, 2008

A new take on the Olympics...

I had never thought of the Olympics in such a way, but what if Europe was competing as one single country instead of its seperate member states? Would we still be behind the likes of China and the USA in the overall medals table?

Beijing Olympic Medals
The answer: apparently not and by quite a long way! As of this morning, Europe (as a collective body) had won a total of 163 medals of all colours which is very impressive.

Obviously the idea of Europe competing as one country is a far-fetched utopian long-shot, but then again didn't everyone say the same things about the implementation of a single currency...

Click here to read the rest of my translation.

Friday, August 15, 2008

Know your limits!

I'm sure that many of you, myself included, have been following the Olympic Games action from Beijing that has somewhat overrun the BBC schedules. I always find the Olympic Games so amazing as it is the only real time of the year when the nation becomes patriotic and cheers on athletes that they have never heard of until now but wear the Great Britain jersey!

So far the UK team has done superb and picked up a good number of medals and has shown itself to be very able on the water in the rowing and sailing competitions. From today, the 'real Olympics' (in my opinion) AKA the track and field has got under way and who knows we might even do well in some of those events... we shall see!

All the while I cannot help thinking about the next Olympics to be held in London (in case you were asleep these last few years) in 2012. The Beijing arenas look fantastic, especially the 'Water Cube' and (don't tell my brother) but even the 'Birds Nest' Olympic stadium (below). But can we match that visually with the constructions on the south bank of the Thames?

The Beijing Olympic Stadium
More importantly perhaps, can we improve our performances in the competitions and get a similar haul of medals to that we're seeing the hosts walk away with? Unless we introduce student knife crime and inner-city shooting into the events perhaps we won't fare any better with the athletes of tomorrow....

But this leads me onto the article on the BBC which amused me greatly. It is an article warning 'wannabe Olympians' to take it easy at home on their exercise bikes and other gym equipment as they are trying to emulate the athletes on the TV. Have a read of the article by
clicking here*.

Of course, the moral of the story is that you should know your own limits. I know mine, and have been on the bike trying to keep myself occupied and just clocked up 22 miles in exactly 60 minutes. I could have probably done more, but then again I'm off kayaking in an hour...

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Why the UK rail network should be re-nationalised...

We all went to Montreux yesterday and made use of the marvellous Swiss train network, CFF, which got me thinking about the state of our own rail system and that it needs to be nationalised once more.

It is well known that here in Switzerland all the trains run like clockwork, arriving and departing exactly on the times stated on the timetables – we’ve noticed that many a time, even with the Bex-Villars mountain train. It is even the same in France with their TGV network. The long distance trains are powered entirely by electricity and as a result are not only really quiet and the ride is smooth, the journey is environmentally friendly. The fares are also very respectable and what I believe is more important is that they are constant – there is a set fare for travel between places and no discount is offered for advanced or online ticket purchases.

The disadvantage, however, of the Swiss system is that services are not as frequent as they are in the UK. A busy station, such as Geneva’s Cointrin will see far fewer trains passing through its platforms than any of the London mainline stations. The CrossCountry train route from Penzance to Glasgow, formerly operated by Virgin Trains, was the route that I often took as I travelled between my home station at Exeter and university in Sheffield. There are two services per hour on that route, which in Switzerland would instead be just one service each hour.

What this inevitably means of course is that there is less traffic on the rails which allows any delays (heaven forbid) can be rectified between stations with a little extra speed. English train services cannot afford this luxury as because there are rival train services competing for consumers, they fill the rail timetables with as many services as they can, which then causes many huge logistical nightmares in terms of signalling and the inevitable knock-on delay that would be transferred upon future services.

Although I do not have the figures, I imagine that the number of passengers using the long distance services in both countries is similar despite the extra train services operating in the UK. I believe this because the long-haul Swiss trains typically carry upwards of 12-15 carriages that are longer than the ones in use in the UK and can hold more passengers. Instead of the typical five carriages on the aforementioned CrossCountry service – ten carriages per hour – the Swiss Geneva to Bern service would boast 15.

Of course, this immediately raises the issue of station size as extra carriages on each train would require longer platforms. From personal experience I believe that such trains could be accommodated at Sheffield, all of the London mainline stations, Bristol Temple Meads, Birmingham New Street, Reading, possibly Manchester Piccadilly and even Exeter St Davids. For other mainline stations perhaps money to expand the platforms would be required, but I would view this as an investment as it would ease the pressure on timetables and reduce the chance of a knock-on delay by removing more services from the rails.

I could not possibly justify this overall argument without tackling the issue of rail fares because this is one of the reasons why people perhaps don’t use the rail service. The fact is that there are too many different options for tickets in the UK. This has arisen from the various companies operating the many routes and trying to undercut their opposition. Recently the Government has announced its plans to have just three types of ticket with the emphasis on those buying in advance as they receive a better price than those who turn up at the station and travel on the day.

Buying in advance via the web has been a tactic I have used to my advantage many a time and have as a result benefited from travelling in First Class rather than Standard Class as the ticket was cheaper. I remember on one of my journeys north on the CrossCountry I caught a glance of my neighbour in First Class’ ticket and saw that I had paid a full £200 less and I was travelling a longer distance.

The most sensible move in my eyes would be to nationalise the fare structure and set a particular rate for travel within the UK. Perhaps this could be organised in zones like those operated by the London Underground or calculated from working out the time taken for that journey using the fastest possible route and the customer paying a set rate per ten minutes.

Unfortunately I cannot foresee the railways becoming re-nationalised as the Government earns a very handsome amount from selling the rights to operating the routes to particular franchises. And while the train services would become less frequent, they would become more reliable, more accessible for a greater number of people, and the fare system would not penalise passengers for not buying their tickets three months in advance.

Who knows, this might even get people out of their cars and onto the rails…

Labels: ,

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Postcard from Switzerland

Greetings from Switzerland! It’s been nearly two years since I was last here but this wonderful countries’ charm has thankfully not worn out. I just love Switzerland, and besides the obvious reasons of the cheese and of course the chocolate, the country boasts one of the most amazing landscapes, some truly breathtaking mountain ranges and some of the friendliest people around. Additionally, of course, they speak French and have a wonderful accent…


Where we’re currently staying combines all of these features nicely. Our chalet, which has a balcony with a view down the valley that I could (and already have) watch for hours, is close to the small mountain town of Gryon. Nearby is a mountain train which links the town to the neighbouring town of Villars and Bex weaving through the valley up some quite tremendous climbs.

The locals all speak which such wonderful and clear accents and all the lovely chalets around are proudly flying their national flags. Now I’m aware that it is approaching August 1st - the Swiss national day- but I have always maintained that there is no better sight than to see houses proudly flying their national flag, an act which of course has been absurdly banned in our country.

Next week, we plan to climb many of the local mountains making use of the numerous cable cars, trains and whatnot. Hopefully we’ll also make it to Montreux, a town famous for its Jazz festival which I believe ended not so long ago, and who knows, perhaps even find some time to consume some of the local chocolate…